Quote:
Originally Posted by T@NK
There are plenty images and info of RS m4/16 AEG and gbbr already, go search them.
|
The man has a point, all the picture are currently just external, there's no 'working' prototype. Basically RS' display is the same as Tokyo Marui's HK45, M&P pistols both are just external wall hanger right now.
I don't want to be rude to RS fans, but judging on how many companies fail miserably on GBBR I'll hold my comments on them.
Examples:
G&P
VFC -AEG was considered medium (internal) medium-high (external)
-> GBBR was considered to be not so good. Bolt carrier wears out, magazine unique from Magna system (doesn't work efficiently)
G&P -AEG was considered to be high (internal) medium-high (external)
-> While there's over 30 variants of WA Magna system, they still use pot metal bolt carrier that will need to be replaced every 3k.
SRC -AEG was considered medium (internal&external)
-> GBBR was considered to be a junk (hop up can't hold zero, plastic magazine tabs
Inokatsu -AEG was considered low-medium (internal) but very high end (external)
-> bolt carrier, nozzle, hammer still breaks even after than 2011 edition (5th generation already) Pricing is ridiculous. Oh and did I mentioned they didn't machine out the forging seam?!? every AR-15 firearm manufacture will CNC machine out those seams, not Inokatsu (but 30% AR-15 lower will)
Base on your business practice, I suggest
AEG:
Real Sword (AK, T97, Dragunov)
VFC (SCAR, AR series)
GBBR:
WE (AR series [M4, M16, hk416], G36 series [G36, G36K, G36C]) but make sure you offer RA-Tech parts as long term the firing parts will wear out and be destroy due to poor material
KJW M4 (nobody really likes the tinted lower when you can get metal lower. and the second reason is $500 2mags for tinted lower is way overpriced)