View Single Post
Old February 14th, 2009, 05:54   #13
KEVORKIAN
 
KEVORKIAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Manitoba
Quote:
Originally Posted by Endymion View Post
How do you Ino owners like it from a pure performance standpoint? Naturally there are some shortcomings, such as extended auto fire and outdoor performance on cold days. Barring that, how would you rate its consistency and hop system? Are there things that *need* to be modded out of the box? Considering a PTW alternative...
Anyone who thinks that the INO or any other gbb M4 is game ready "out of the box" will be disappointed. The first thing I'm replacing is the bolt carrier, it's just too heavy and causes too much gas consumption...this thing is a gas hog! Keep in mind that the INO's internals (material & build quality) were manufactured to handle a Co2 gas system but there are no mags available...YET!
As for the hop-up, further testing will be required once warmer temperatures arrive. Out of the box, it's pretty bang on but then again I only have 30 feet in the basement I'm distancing it at!
As for considering the INO as a PTW-alternative...that's for you to decide. I can say that if I was given the choice between fielding a PTW or INO during game day...I would choose my PTW, hands down!

Quote:
Originally Posted by hongkong100 View Post
love it but iam not a big fan of the black body could be just a bit lighter
Once my Prime kits arrive the stock INO body will be sent off for trade removal, sandblast, engraving of proper trades followed by a thick powdercoat in a matte black finish.
I have to say the most disappointing part of the INO is the upper & lower receiver quality...the overall fit & finish is just not there considering what you pay for!
__________________
Kevorkian


I SUPPORT THE USE OF SILICA BB BASTARDS!
KEVORKIAN is offline   Reply With Quote