OMG OMG OMG IM FU%ING DONE!

[pusangani]

Originally Posted by kos

http://www.arsenal-bg.com/history.htm

STOP TALKING OUT OF YOUR ASS...

fuccckkkk....

For the lazy...

From 1977 till 1989 the factory was known in Bulgaria and abroad as "F.Engels" Machine Building Plant. The machinery fleet is continually improved and modernized thus enlarging the possibilities for a wider scale of production. Simultaneously grew the number and the qualification of the specialists. All that was a premise for perfecting the licenced production, design and serial production of new products:

1971-72 - 9x18 mm pistol cartridges;
1971-73 - 7,62 mm machine gun ;
1972-74 - 9 mm "Makarov" pistol;
1976-78 - 7,62 mm tank machine gun ;
1983 - 23 mm anti-aircraft system ZU-23-2;
1984-86 - 5,45 mm assault rifle ;
1985-87 - 5,45x39,5mm cartridges;
1986-87 - 122 mm howitzer etc.

dude drop it, so arsenal has been around for some time, doesnt change the fact that the flashhider is ugly and looks like a flashlight

[Lakonian]

Originally Posted by Amos

I not see that and retract my irate screaming post

You said AMERICAN... their roots are clearly NOT.

[Amos]

Originally Posted by kos

You said AMERICAN... their roots are clearly NOT.

Hence why I edited out my irate post.

[ancorp]

I believe that muzzle brake appeared first on the Bulgarian AKSU. Those Arsenal AKs are civilian variants, I personally wouldn't think anything as a civilian build can be considered as standard for military issue.

Nonetheless I agree with everyone else, it looks way off on an AK-47.

GZA, That's a Type3 milled receiver.

Kos if he replaces the upper handguard with a stock one like you suggest, how will the EOtech go on, also as you suggest? Seems senseless to get a sideplate and a rail that goes over the top cover if he has a railed upper for that EOtech already...

[Lakonian]

Originally Posted by ancorp

Kos if he replaces the upper handguard with a stock one like you suggest, how will the EOtech go on, also as you suggest? Seems senseless to get a sideplate and a rail that goes over the top cover if he has a railed upper for that EOtech already...

Nono, I worded that wrong. I mean .. if we isn't going to put an optic on there, he should just use the plain upper.. BUT, if he plans on mounting an optic (EOTech recommended) he should leave it on.

OD does look slightly corny, though....

[ShelledPants]

Originally Posted by kos

Nono, I worded that wrong. I mean .. if we isn't going to put an optic on there, he should just use the plain upper.. BUT, if he plans on mounting an optic (EOTech recommended) he should leave it on.

OD does look slightly corny, though....

Doesn't exactly break the lines in the rifle much, does it?

[BORDENSNIPER]

well the OD butstock is being replaced hopefully soon, since Juggles told me he is getting the tactical butstock OD.

muzzlebreak is staying on for now.

like the input, thanks for hating and loving!

[ancorp]

Nothing wrong with accessorizing to what you like and consider looking good, everyone has their own opinion.

But don't be offended if I distance myself from you during games because of it. Or throw things at you from a moving car.