|
|||||||||
|
Home | Forums | Register | Gallery | FAQ | Calendar |
Retailers | Community | News/Info | International Retailers | IRC | Today's Posts |
|
Thread Tools |
March 20th, 2012, 11:24 | #16 | |
Quote:
|
||
March 20th, 2012, 19:37 | #17 |
Not Eye Safe, Pretty Boy Maximus on the field take his picture!
|
Also depends on the gun.
A systema M100 on a CYMA M4 might get you 300fps On a fully upgraded king arms M4, will get you the full 365fps |
March 20th, 2012, 19:51 | #18 |
I had to put a m90 in my m4 to get below 350. The m100 had me shooting mid 390's. Safe bet would be the m90. And jugglez great to deal with
__________________
Looking to get age verified in York region? Click link... |
|
March 20th, 2012, 20:25 | #19 |
Yes, lots of people will tell you to get an M90 (or equivalent) spring. This allows you to have FPS hovering around the 300-340 mark, depending on the gun, which will usually qualify you for CQB skirmishes and provide a good platform for Field games. It's a Win-Win spring.
__________________
[]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]] ------)_'_\ * ( "----------\ * \ "-----------\_*_\ |
|
March 21st, 2012, 01:14 | #20 |
yes, lets not leave compression out of this discussion aswell. If your gun has a loss of compression, the spring is the least of your worries, fix your compression problem then move onto a larger spring if need be! we dont want any broken gearboxes or broken gears for absolutely no reason!
|
|
December 6th, 2012, 19:07 | #21 |
Well i just chrono'd my KA today stock im getting 400 with .2, I would recommend the m90- to m95 ... i got a m95 havent installed it yet but fingers are crossed that it will keep it under 350 if anyone else is using a m95 could you tell me what your shooting at
|
|
December 6th, 2012, 19:30 | #22 |
m90 = 90 meters (per second) = ~300fps
m95 = 95 meters (per second) = ~315fps |
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|