|
|||||||||
|
Home | Forums | Register | Gallery | FAQ | Calendar |
Retailers | Community | News/Info | International Retailers | IRC | Today's Posts |
|
Thread Tools |
April 6th, 2014, 22:50 | #16 |
Mr. Silencer
|
I'm not entirely convinced that short-stroking by 4 teeth is efficient.
|
April 6th, 2014, 22:52 | #17 |
why not?
What do you suggest to decrease fps to 350 then? |
|
April 6th, 2014, 23:02 | #18 |
Squid Porn Superstar, I love the tentacles!
|
Use a m110. And yes I'm sure it's a m100, bought it off stealth.
Short stroking in itself does not increase rate of fire much or increase efficiency. |
April 6th, 2014, 23:05 | #19 |
Mr. Silencer
|
|
April 7th, 2014, 08:11 | #20 |
Short stroking decreases the piston cycle therefore increasing trigger response and that was what i was aiming for.. It also may increase thw rps slightly.
I'll test it with an m100 that i got here, i don't have any m110 atm.. I went with the m120 to avoid pre engagement, but you are right, it was probably not necessary.. When i have the time i'll try it with the m100 and with a m110 if i cant get one until then. Thanks for your critics |
|
April 13th, 2014, 17:11 | #21 | |
Squid Porn Superstar, I love the tentacles!
|
Quote:
I don't believe in pre-engagement from a gun running too fast. I have a gun doing 56 RPS with a M100, no pre-engagement. Ran it at 45 RPS for approx 4k rounds and it's still going strong. |
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|