Airsoft Canada
https://blackblitzairsoft.myshopify.com/

Go Back   Airsoft Canada > General > General
Home Forums Register Gallery FAQ Calendar
Retailers Community News/Info International Retailers IRC Today's Posts

Heavy Weight bbs

:

General

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old August 27th, 2008, 19:42   #16
grantmac
 
grantmac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Victoria, BC
Why not some sort of ceramic? Or perhaps something like very hard durometer polyurethane?
Cheers,
Grant
grantmac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 27th, 2008, 20:06   #17
Houston
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Saskatoon
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tirador View Post
i have here .878g bbs (6mm solid steel ball bearing )for gas powered guns. hit me up if interested.

pic.
The gun would need to be extremely powerful to be able to shoot those at a reasonable speed.
Houston is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 27th, 2008, 22:22   #18
CANADIAN BACON
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: KOOTENAY/B.C.
Question B/C anyone

Just to pose a question here.
Is the assumption "Heavy Ammo is more Accurate"????
In powder guns B/C (ballistic coefficient) is all important.
Does B/C have any place in A/S language?
CANADIAN BACON is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 27th, 2008, 22:58   #19
Scarecrow
A Total Bastard
 
Scarecrow's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Tottenham
Send a message via Skype™ to Scarecrow
Quote:
Originally Posted by grantmac View Post
Why not some sort of ceramic? Or perhaps something like very hard durometer polyurethane?
Cheers,
Grant
The material has to be compatible with our current manufacturing process - I'm not up on all the science of it, I just sell the stuff...
__________________
LIKE us on Facebook!!
Scarecrow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 27th, 2008, 23:50   #20
grantmac
 
grantmac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Victoria, BC
I'm assuming some sort of molding process using heat and then polished to remove the mold marks? Probably polyurethane would be compatable except I believe it's a two part substance. The entire question is whether it's any heavier than your current ABS, do you have any idea what the density is?
Thanks,
Grant
grantmac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 27th, 2008, 23:54   #21
Scarecrow
A Total Bastard
 
Scarecrow's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Tottenham
Send a message via Skype™ to Scarecrow
Quote:
Originally Posted by grantmac View Post
do you have any idea what the density is?
No idea. I know that adding plastics of different densities causes some problems in the integrity of the BB as well - weight is only one part of the formula but things like polishability, even distribute of material in the substrate, etc... its a lot more complicated.
__________________
LIKE us on Facebook!!
Scarecrow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 28th, 2008, 00:26   #22
CDN_Stalker
Official ASC Bladesmith
 
CDN_Stalker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Ottawa, Ont.
Send a message via MSN to CDN_Stalker
Quote:
Originally Posted by LUTNIT View Post
.34 are most definitely plastic still, as I have used .43's and they are 100% plastic. The .88's might be aluminum.
.88g are steel.

Aluminum BBs, SOLID aluminum BBs, only ones I've ever seen (and I had a bag years ago) were 0.29g.
CDN_Stalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 28th, 2008, 00:28   #23
CDN_Stalker
Official ASC Bladesmith
 
CDN_Stalker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Ottawa, Ont.
Send a message via MSN to CDN_Stalker
Quote:
Originally Posted by CANADIAN BACON View Post
Just to pose a question here.
Is the assumption "Heavy Ammo is more Accurate"????
In powder guns B/C (ballistic coefficient) is all important.
Does B/C have any place in A/S language?
Yes. Effective range is increased, to a point (too heavy decreases it) but maximum range (where the land) is reduced. Hard to explain in one or two sentences. 0.30g has pretty much the best B/C out of every weight of airsoft BB out there.
CDN_Stalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 28th, 2008, 00:40   #24
FOX_111
Le Roi des poissons d'avril
 
FOX_111's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Terrebonne, Québec
Not to be finniky, but it's the 0.29g BBs that are the best overal in range/speed/acuracy.

But the 0.30g offer very good performance for rifle firing under 550fps.
__________________

Vérificateur d'âge: Terrebonne
FOX_111 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 28th, 2008, 00:49   #25
DENZILDON
 
DENZILDON's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Calgary
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tirador View Post
i have here .878g bbs (6mm solid steel ball bearing )for gas powered guns. hit me up if interested.

pic.
Hahaha, Nice one pare! Is this the one you use for your tirador?!

Last edited by DENZILDON; August 28th, 2008 at 01:03..
DENZILDON is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 28th, 2008, 00:56   #26
CDN_Stalker
Official ASC Bladesmith
 
CDN_Stalker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Ottawa, Ont.
Send a message via MSN to CDN_Stalker
Quote:
Originally Posted by FOX_111 View Post
Not to be finniky, but it's the 0.29g BBs that are the best overal in range/speed/acuracy.

But the 0.30g offer very good performance for rifle firing under 550fps.
Minor issue, barely any difference from my testing. Not even an fps difference. It's a 0.01g difference. The only difference between a 0.29g and a 0.30g is literally the make. 0.29g is only made by Maruzen, very perfectly made BBs, used them for two years, and the past year I've been using 0.30g Bastards and am REALLY impressed with them. Even compared them to the SIIS 0.30g BBs and found an increase of about 20fps with the Bastards over SIIS, for the same BB weight, gun set up. What stunned me most was the difference between 0.28g and 0.30g Bastards, there was almost identical velocities measured with the exact same set up across diffferent guns. Heavier weight without velocity loss = AWESOME!!!
CDN_Stalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 28th, 2008, 01:14   #27
Donster
 
Donster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: GTA
for heavier weight bbs, why can you have a very small ball of metal and coat the exterior in the BB plastic? would that not solve the weight issue?
Donster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 28th, 2008, 01:19   #28
Tirador
 
Tirador's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Japan
for .878g you need at least 800 psi to hit the target in 50 meters.
the velocity is only 300-400 fps (rough estimate).

if you are familiar with monster airsoft (electric-co2 gun ) he uses this kind of bb.
Lastly a friend of mine using this bb for killing a distractive rodents in his farm.
__________________
CLICK HERE TO MY WEBSITE

Last edited by Tirador; August 28th, 2008 at 01:23..
Tirador is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 28th, 2008, 01:24   #29
Aquamarine
PanSexual
 
Aquamarine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Asakusa, Japan
Send a message via MSN to Aquamarine Send a message via Yahoo to Aquamarine Send a message via Skype™ to Aquamarine
Sorry, but what IS a tirador? He's said he'll come play with me in Japan with my Tirador... wtf is it?
__________________
Aquamarine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 28th, 2008, 01:27   #30
Luckless
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Charlottetown, PE
Quote:
Originally Posted by DONSTER 125 View Post
for heavier weight bbs, why can you have a very small ball of metal and coat the exterior in the BB plastic? would that not solve the weight issue?
likely the biggest factor limiting that is properly centering the core and being able to put the shell on cheaply and effectively. If it is off center by even a small fraction of however you want to measure it, then you'll get random spinning and could have very drastic effects on the flight path.
Luckless is offline   Reply With Quote
ReplyTop


Go Back   Airsoft Canada > General > General

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Airsoft Canada
https://blackblitzairsoft.myshopify.com/

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 22:10.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.