|
|||||||||
|
Home | Forums | Register | Gallery | FAQ | Calendar |
Retailers | Community | News/Info | International Retailers | IRC | Today's Posts |
|
Thread Tools |
December 5th, 2009, 01:35 | #1 |
Kjw m9 - tm m9
Do the TM M9 and the KJW M9 have interchangeable parts?
Im doing a couple minor upgrads to my KJW M9 pistol. I find it much easier to run across TM M9 labelled parts rather than KJW specific parts. Hope someone out there knows. Thanks ^_^ |
|
December 5th, 2009, 04:55 | #2 |
Red Wine & Adderall
|
The steel mag catch made by guarder for the TM M9 does not appropriately fit the KJ M9 and will require some modification to fit properly. At this point in time I have not had any issues with guarder recoil springs, or King Arms internal spring replacement kits as far as compatibility goes.
__________________
"Its only a little bit on fire" |
December 5th, 2009, 12:39 | #3 |
The recoil spring and spring kit were two products I were interested in purchasing.
Thank you, this is great to know. I was also looking at getting a precision barrel. Once again there are nothing but barrels deemed compatible with the TM M9. |
|
December 31st, 2009, 00:12 | #4 | |
aka SNK or Shaniqua
|
Quote:
What benefit does adding the steel mag catch add?
__________________
SHÖCK |
|
December 31st, 2009, 00:50 | #5 | |
Quote:
I have a spare..
__________________
|
||
December 31st, 2009, 00:56 | #6 | |
Quote:
The steel mag catch will eliminate this problem, however I wonder if it'll increase the wear on the mag itself.
__________________
Last edited by aznpos531; December 31st, 2009 at 17:47.. |
||
December 31st, 2009, 01:47 | #7 |
aka SNK or Shaniqua
|
Yeah, I know on my Mp5, the metal mag catch wore down the metal on the mags eventually and they started to slip out. I think the plastic catch is actually better long-term for the mags.
Still, I am in the process of buying parts for my M9 so I was curious about this part.
__________________
SHÖCK |
December 31st, 2009, 02:10 | #8 | |
Quote:
|
||
|
Bookmarks |
|
|