|
|||||||||
|
Home | Forums | Register | Gallery | FAQ | Calendar |
Retailers | Community | News/Info | International Retailers | IRC | Today's Posts |
|
Thread Tools |
August 6th, 2011, 02:25 | #1 |
Question about C02 vs. HPA rig for KJW M700
How much psi from an air compressor do you need for an HPA tank?
Does the CO2 rig lose fps every shot, like in the cheap CO2 pistols? Does the CO2 rig have adjustable velocity? Like the HPA. Is either more accurate or more consistent? Hopefully someone with experience with either set up can help. Thanks. |
|
August 6th, 2011, 05:11 | #2 | ||||
Although I have never done it with a KJW M700, I do use an external HPA rig for my G&P WA M4.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Here's some links: WTS: Pre-assembled dual-reg gas rigs Air Rigs Parts List Air Rig Planning Ahead
__________________
KLUSTER [FLUX] Last edited by KLusTeR; August 6th, 2011 at 08:39.. |
|||||
August 6th, 2011, 10:09 | #3 |
E-01
|
That GBB lover guy is a f'n tool. There should be an Intellectual Trauma warning next to that link
__________________
|
August 6th, 2011, 12:21 | #4 |
So with C02 and a bolt action rifle, I shouldn't expect an fps decline?
|
|
August 6th, 2011, 18:41 | #5 |
If your talking about an external rig of CO2, then you shouldn't notice a difference between CO2 and HPA except effeciency of shoots per tank. External rig always require a regulator, the fps is as consistent as the regulator.
|
|
August 6th, 2011, 18:44 | #6 |
Ok thanks acer I get it.
|
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|