|
|
|
December 12th, 2007, 07:31
|
#31 |
|
What makes me wonder is why 400fps is the magic number when I know MANY guns who shoot about 340-360 who are extremely accurate and durable.
Most anywhere, 400 is an upper safety limit, not a goal. A lower FPS lasts longer, is accurate if well done, and will not cost anywhere as much. Not to mention fewer headaches in upgrades. But hey, what do I know, right? |
|
|
|
December 12th, 2007, 18:07
|
#32 | |
|
Quote:
I am going at a game later tonigh with my 340 FPS G36K... accurate as hell... |
|
|
|
|
|
December 15th, 2007, 02:59
|
#33 |
|
range
Not that an extra 40-60 fps will carry your bb to the moon, but every bit helps.
__________________
"To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk." - Edison |
|
|
|
  |
|
||||||
| Bookmarks |
|
|
 |
|
