|
|||||||||
|
Home | Forums | Register | Gallery | FAQ | Calendar |
Retailers | Community | News/Info | International Retailers | IRC | Today's Posts |
|
Thread Tools |
September 11th, 2008, 22:35 | #16 |
Lego Head
|
Luckless, I don't know if you're saying auto fire as in full automatic fire of the gun or thinking that UAV means that no one is controlling it. Both cases you'd be wrong, a simple servo could actuate the trigger on a mounted AEG, or a relay to the micro-switch in an M249 AEG would answer automatic fire.
UAV simply means "Unmanned", does not mean that its has to be totally autonomous; just that the operator of the vehicle is not on board but simply controlling it from a protected remote location. Labo, I'd suggest highly against having power cut to the whole vehicle, simply to the weapon alone would be suffice and reduce chance of a "failure" where the vehicle will get caught in terrain. Basically if all power is cut there is the chance that on board fail safes to the receiver not work properly and possibly cause harm to the vehicle. This is why I would suggest the red flashing beacon light; like our red flags, it would signal that the vehicle is down. Vehicle Operators would be held to the same honor system as the rest of us, should their vehicle be hit and the beacon flash to stop firing as the vehicle is "dead". I think though that the problem is that aside from recon, R/C vehicles would be very hard to implement regulations on in our game. R/C aircraft have the unique ability that they really can be used significantly for recon purposes with out "Entering the battlefield". As long as no weapon is attached to an airvehicle I see no need to be "able" to fire upon it. It would be similar to the Predators today which are rather small in size and fly so high that there are few weapons avail. to hit them. That said one could implement into scenario's AA stations that have such weapons and basically take such a unit "out" of the game and force the operator to remove the craft from theatre and land it. One could even then implement limited "spawns" as replacements for the feild, simulating relocating/take off of another aircraft to the theatre. Land based becomes hard again though because as Recon units its directly in the line of fire, thus making sense to be able to open fire on the damned thing. It bloody well can't fall from the sky ((which also opens the question of what or WHO it lands on)), but would need an intricate new set of rules.
__________________
_________________________________ "The hydrogen economy car from the people who brought you the 'Hindenburg'" - Glen Foster Condoms do not guarantee safe sex any more. A friend of mine wore one and was shot by the woman's husband! |
September 11th, 2008, 23:59 | #17 |
I'm up for being Engineer building a senty gun and just waiting for people to fall for it...... oops too much teamfortress.
|
|
September 12th, 2008, 12:00 | #18 |
It seems like a cool idea to implement, especially considering the modern battlefield technologies that are out there - it only seems right to try and re-create them in airsoft. But the idea of an expensive toy being shot from the sky would worry me (if I had intended to buy one) since there's always someone who manages to break things like that.
|
|
September 12th, 2008, 12:10 | #19 | |
Monkey with a Gun
|
use rocket launchers against tanks
Quote:
the thing is neato!!! I love all types of different scenarios. I have been working on a spy sat idea. If it works I will let you know YouTube - Alias MKX Rocket Launcher - rocket launcher you want to make it easier and just make it armour for it if you encounter any of these. they shoot pretty hard. if we dont embrace new tech we may as well just play WW2 reenactment....not that there anything wrong with that
__________________
"Anyone who has the power to make you believe absurdities has the power to make you commit injustices." Voltaire AV for Barrie, Orillia, Innisfil, Bradford Region - pm me if you need AV'd I'm the Barrie Bastard. http://www.bbbastard.com/ Cheese is good. Last edited by deep in the bush; September 12th, 2008 at 12:14.. |
|
September 12th, 2008, 12:11 | #20 |
what about those little $100 RC tanks that shoots BBs 30feet?
|
|
September 12th, 2008, 13:46 | #21 |
SIMONED
|
Why the hell does this little fucker look so familiar to me...? Reminds me of a R/C prop on a film I worked on years back... When I remember, I'll post it. |
September 12th, 2008, 14:47 | #22 |
Lego Head
|
Reminds me of some of the background robots in T3. Put a set of Fisher Price Binocular on it and we would have another Short Circuit robot :P
__________________
_________________________________ "The hydrogen economy car from the people who brought you the 'Hindenburg'" - Glen Foster Condoms do not guarantee safe sex any more. A friend of mine wore one and was shot by the woman's husband! |
September 12th, 2008, 15:03 | #23 | |
8=======D
|
Quote:
__________________
Brian McIlmoyle TTAC3 Director CAPS Range Officer Toronto Downtown Age Verifier OPERATION WOODSMAN If the tongue could cut as the sword does, the dead would be infinite |
|
September 12th, 2008, 16:57 | #24 |
What? I expect a robot that is given a set of simple tasks that it can be dedicated to to do them far better than a human would.
|
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|