Cybergun quality

[teriases]

Hi guys. I digged around can't find much reviews on the Cybergun Mauser L96...

Hows the brand in general? I know they are European made. Are they on par with say maruzen?

Any info is greatly appreciated.

[Conker]

Cybergun repacks and gets licenses. They do not manufacture anything themselves.

Their L96 is that usual chinese L96 repack (depending on the batch it may be the Well, the BE or the Warrior but they're pretty much the same).

[Daiviet]

Not on par at all. I'm a firm believer in buying quality over shit, and the only quality you'll get in the form of an L96 is either a Maruzen or TM. TM is still new though, not at many upgrades available for it.

[etd]

Okay I'm going to step outside the circle of cybergun hate and give you an honest opinion with their current line of guns.

First off, everything these people have said above is true two years ago.

Facts: cybergun has severly increased their quality control as well and has moved to almost all tm compatible parts. Before I get flames in regards to the tm compatible parts comment.... In the past I found that most of their guns (I've owned 4 by the way so this is speaking from experience and its not just Internet opinion) copied tm designs but didn't really match up specs wise for after market upgrades.

Since about 1-2 years ago cyma has become a reputable low/mid-grade company as opposed to utter. Anyone who [b]actually owns any of their news stuff, example: sig 556, ak series (this year's only) or mp5s (within last season) will vouch that's they are fair priced guns with good quality (based on pricing).

They aren't on the same level as say classic army, real sword or g&g for example but they are no longer equal to companies likes BE.

If anyone has a difference of opinion, including the poster, please read new reviews on their new line up of guns or even ask a asc retailer who sells their stuff. To summarize cybergun has really stepped up their game and their guns are worth buying if you are on a budget but remember that you get what you pay for so expect to be replacing your air seal parts at the very least.

[Ripperman79]

+1 there alot better then what they used to be but still not great, but if your getting a sniper you might want to look around abit more because a $300 sniper and a $400 sniper can be night and day

[teriases]

Originally Posted by etd

Okay I'm going to step outside the circle of cybergun hate and give you an honest opinion with their current line of guns.

First off, everything these people have said above is true two years ago.

Facts: cybergun has severly increased their quality control as well and has moved to almost all tm compatible parts. Before I get flames in regards to the tm compatible parts comment.... In the past I found that most of their guns (I've owned 4 by the way so this is speaking from experience and its not just Internet opinion) copied tm designs but didn't really match up specs wise for after market upgrades.

Since about 1-2 years ago cyma has become a reputable low/mid-grade company as opposed to utter. Anyone who [b]actually owns any of their news stuff, example: sig 556, ak series (this year's only) or mp5s (within last season) will vouch that's they are fair priced guns with good quality (based on pricing).

They aren't on the same level as say classic army, real sword or g&g for example but they are no longer equal to companies likes BE.

If anyone has a difference of opinion, including the poster, please read new reviews on their new line up of guns or even ask a asc retailer who sells their stuff. To summarize cybergun has really stepped up their game and their guns are worth buying if you are on a budget but remember that you get what you pay for so expect to be replacing your air seal parts at the very least.

Thanks for the very informative info everyone.

[Amos]

Originally Posted by etd

Okay I'm going to step outside the circle of cybergun hate and give you an honest opinion with their current line of guns.

First off, everything these people have said above is true two years ago.

Facts: cybergun has severly increased their quality control as well and has moved to almost all tm compatible parts. Before I get flames in regards to the tm compatible parts comment.... In the past I found that most of their guns (I've owned 4 by the way so this is speaking from experience and its not just Internet opinion) copied tm designs but didn't really match up specs wise for after market upgrades.

Since about 1-2 years ago cyma has become a reputable low/mid-grade company as opposed to utter. Anyone who [b]actually owns any of their news stuff, example: sig 556, ak series (this year's only) or mp5s (within last season) will vouch that's they are fair priced guns with good quality (based on pricing).

They aren't on the same level as say classic army, real sword or g&g for example but they are no longer equal to companies likes BE.

If anyone has a difference of opinion, including the poster, please read new reviews on their new line up of guns or even ask a asc retailer who sells their stuff. To summarize cybergun has really stepped up their game and their guns are worth buying if you are on a budget but remember that you get what you pay for so expect to be replacing your air seal parts at the very least.

Hate to burst your bubble here but Cybergun isn't a gun production company, they're a re-branding and re-naming company.

And the L96's are STILL shit.

TM L96 is the way to go, There are TONNES of upgrades available for them already.

[Styrak]

The new Mauser is a WELL, just FYI, and the quality is pretty good.